Talk:Languages

Thoughts on consistent structure for Languages?
The wiki isn't very consistent on how languages should be handled. Greek redirects here, and Greek doesn't add much specific to that language. On the other hand, Aramaic is a candidate for deletion because Aramaic covers all of it's information and does so very well, including a fair amount of Aramaic-specific information. It would be really nice to have all of them follow the same system, but I'm not sure what's best for that system to be. Charientist (talk) 21:23, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Charientist I've gone ahead and made Aramaic as well as Written in Aramaic redirect to Aramaic. I think having one page for each languages probably makes the most sense right now, they aren't complicated enough to need more than one page. -Freedomlibertyeagle (talk) 11:01, 18 February 2019 (UTC)